David Powlison is always helpful, even when he writes on pornography. Here's his article in two
parts.
Note: He also has a booklet for those who have suffered from child abuse.
HT: Justin Taylor
David Powlison is always helpful, even when he writes on pornography. Here's his article in two
parts.
Note: He also has a booklet for those who have suffered from child abuse.
HT: Justin Taylor
How to Read a Book by Mortimer J. Adler
Hunting Eichmann: How a Band of Survivors and a Young Spy Agency Chased Down the World'sMost Notorious Nazi by Neal BascombHead over and try out Readability. It's wonderful. For any online article, news story, blog post, etc, it can
And best of all, it takes about 3 seconds to get going with it. All you have to do is go to the website, choose 3 settings, and then drag the bookmarklet. For all subsequent online reading simply click on the link on your toolbar and happy reading!
HT Alan Jacobs
As I've mentioned before, I really like N.D. Wilson. He brings out the kid in me. Anyways, things get humorous when this skilful storyteller tells his kids bedtime stories. And in this Q&A he recounts a funny family story involving a baby, a mummy, and "a very cavalier mouse".
HT Doug Wilson
I've noticed two ways in which we use the word "church" (Greek, ekklesia) differently from New Testament usage.
There's nothing wrong with using the word "church" or "assembly", but in both cases the speaker is (usually) using the word to refer to something other than people.
At any rate, to be consistent, those who criticise speakers prone to the first usage should also criticize the second.
“When words are many, transgression is not lacking, but whoever restrains his lips is prudent” (Proverbs 10.20).
Con Cambell has an excellent blog series going on preaching evangelistic sermons. It's been helping me.
His last post really needs to be heard. Which is a shame, because evangelists shoudn't need to hear it. His advice? Exegete the text!
Often we have the mindset of, "Oh, I already know what John 3.16 is all about." Don't be so sure. Here's Cambell's list of things the preacher could discover about the parable of the tax collector and the Pharisee (Luke 18.9-14) through exegesis, but probably won't without it:
1. The setting is likely one of the two daily atonement services at the temple.
2. The Pharisee does not ask God for anything, but his prayer is really a declaration.
3. Because the setting is likely an atonement service, there are other people present, which means that the Pharisee's prayer publicly denounces the tax collector (v.11).
4. Because the setting is public, the tax collector's standing far off emphasizes his shame (v.13).
5. It was extremely rare for men to beat their chest in public, and they would only do so in an instance of overwhelming grief (v.13).
6. The tax collector asks God TO BE PROPITIOUS toward him (ἱλάσθητί μοι, v.13).
7. And thus, the tax collector is justified in direct connection to propitiation at an atonement service (v.14).
His conclusion:
I think that those things—which can only be understood through really working on the text in its historical and literary context—bring the passage to bear in a way that few evangelistic preachers would allow.
Our good friend Malcolm is back in Ukraine. Helen and I (and Aimee—in two-week-old fetus form!) went with Malcolm a year and a half ago. It was about this time two years ago that we were excitedly experiencing God opening doors for us to go. Hope He's got a big one for Malcolm to go through.
I used to think that when people remembered my name it meant I was really special. Now I realize I'm only special if I'm remembering someone else's.
I've come up with a question that I've got to ask myself for every Biblical passage I'm going to preach:
What is the one thing in this passage that people need to hear someone get excited about?
Two qualifiers
Let John Piper help you allay any remaining fears of bad luck. My fears of Friday the 13th were erased 9 months ago.
Became thoughtful while reading 2 Corinthians 12.5-10 tonight. I'll lay out verses 8 to 10 for you:
Three times I pleaded with the Lord about this, that it should leave me. 9But he said to me, "My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness." Therefore I will boast all the more gladly of my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may rest upon me. 10For the sake of Christ, then, I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and calamities. For when I am weak, then I am strong.
I was reflecting on how true this has been in my life. It's when I've been insulted and accused (sometimes rightfully), when I've been close to the heart of some controversy, when I've just narrowly avoided catastrophe, or when I've sinned awfully and good friends confronted me on it (like when I lost my temper in front of my family, or slandered a Christian brother), that I have learned what I was really made of. When I get glimpses of what my dark heart is really like, I'm forced to look at Christ and rely on Him. When I am weak, I am strong.
We all feel a need to hide our weaknesses as long as we can. We have to, we say, in order to protect our relationships. My relationship with Christ is the only one in which I am free not just to acknowledge my weakness, or confess it, but to actually embrace it. To boast of it.
To embrace my weakness is to be embraced (in a manly way, you know) by Him. To boast in my weakness is to boast in His strength.
Anyways, after my reading I noticed this good post by Nathan Weselake. Also, Dave Black's got a book on the subject (I think). I bet it's good!
Would you evangelize with this tract?
Certainly Jesus did not sound like someone desperate to create a following when he summons us like he does in Mark 8.34: "If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me!"
"Anyone interested in following me? You get to carry a cross! You get to die! You get to be shamed!"
The Lord Jesus does not offer many perks. When men and women decide to follow him, it is because of how attractive HE is, despite the "perks".
Thought I'd do a little post on what I look for in a Bible. One of the most important criteria for me is that it lay out the text in paragraphs. As Fee and Stuart say in "How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth", we must learn to THINK PARAGRAPHS. It's vital to remember that the Bible is not a collection of golden nuggets and trite sayings, but rather it advances via paragraphs of thought. My reading of Scripture grew in leaps and bounds when I started using a Bible that laid out Isaiah or Mark's Gospel paragraph by paragraph. So much so that I'll rarely pick up a good version like the NASB95 because it doesn't place spaces between paragraphs. (For those who want to use the KJV, I believe Cambridge puts out a beautiful paragraph edition. The Penfold-Newberry is OK. The Scofield's paragraphing is too arbitrary, it seems to me.)
What criteria are important to you in selecting a Bible? Hopefully not size!
With the following free software you can:
* access your work on any computer, and write it at the same time as a colleague
* never lose your work - automatically save to the internet every few seconds
* never ruin your work - previous versions of a document are always available
* add library catalog entries to your bibliography automatically, in your chosen style
* attach notes to a book or article which you can search and find later
* copy web pages or articles or documents which you can search later
* search videos from many sources (like YouTube) and save them (increasingly important!)
* copy pages from online books and save them as searchable documents
* save photocopies online and search them as though they were text documents